Terrorism and Poverty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Terrorism and pauperisation - Essay ExampleFinally, the phrase was again used in 2001 and still is being used.An operative rendering in US foreign policy under the Federal Criminal code and stated by Bush as, todays state of contend on terror is like the Cold War. It is an ideological struggle with an enemy that despises immunity and pursues totalitarian aims....I vowed then that I would use all as stiffs of our power of Shock and Awe to win the war on terror. And so I said we were going to stay on the offense two ship canal one, hunts down the enemy and brings them to justice, and takes threats seriously and two, spread freedom.The British have approximately objections to the phrase War on Terror. The conductor of Public Prosecutions and head of the Crown Prosecution Service in the UK, Ken McDonald has stated that the places where these attacks are carried reveal are not battlefields and the people who die are not victims of war. Also, the people who carry out such(prenominal )(prenominal) terrorist activities are not soldiers, they are criminals.The war on poverty was first introduced by Lyndon B. Johnson, President of the joined States. The legislation was a reaction to the high economic poverty rate. This led to the development of Office of economical Opportunity (OEO) which gartered in targeting funds towards the poor and managing the poverty level that existed in the country at that time. The judgment of war on poverty waned around the 1960s. The budget towards the impoverished people diminished and there was some de-regulation which led to this. There are umpteen view points which are very subjective to every individual. legion(predicate) leaders, economists and politicians have commented on this. To some, the war on poverty is important to be victorious in the war on terror to others finale terrorism is more important while still to some finishing poverty is more important. One very important factor to not is that to fight such wars, institu tional structures need to be created which can help fight the war, this is as important as the conflict itself. The public has failed to win the war on poverty. This can be blamed to the political system and the judiciary. In my opinion, the pep pill class of society needs to be blamed more they should lick more contributions towards the poor to help diminish the huge gap that exists between the different classes of society. The power that the government has is limited, they can not make all people rich or provide them with the money they need. They can only make a few changes in the policy to help these people get a job, get better pays or start a business. The government can not ban legitimate products and not raise engage across the nation they have other things to consider such as inflation. On the brighter side of the picture, many new policies and legislations were made which opened new doors for the lower class of society, labour laws were introduced, minimum wages were s et and there is strict control over these policies. Thus in the US much improvement has taken place and we can easily say that they have achieved some yards in this war. According to Hilary Benn (2007), by full-grown a name to the war on terror, we are not only giving all such groups an identity, a common identity but also it leads to using one uniform approach towards struggle them. All such groups need to be handled individually, with policies and strategies